———-

Dear Editors,

What could possibly be the reason to impose limits on how many letters one can write to the editor?  I would answer my own question for the benefit of some people who may not understand yet: it gets dull week after week.  I wholeheartedly agree with J B Anthony in his suggestion that this would be taken to the internet.  We are  fortunate to live in a time when one can create a website for absolutely nothing and get their opinions out.  With no restrictions on how often you can write and a huge potential readership, what more could you ask for?  Especially for things that do not pertain so much to our town as our country and the world that lies outside.

One of the problems I see in some of these letters is the fact the author cannot overcome their own perceived ingenuity.  I’m sorry Mr. Byrne, but this is a small puddle and if you had experience with anything outside I don’t personally think you’d have such a big ego, nor the same political views.  I’ve been to Japan.  South Korea.  Singapore.  Mexico.  Canada.  In the grand scheme of things feeding yourself bits of congratulatory wit only serves to set yourself apart as someone who cannot look past their own nose to the people who have not spent their entire life in a white farming community.  In fact I’ve seen quite a few excellent letters to the editor and you’re not only praising yourself, you’re disregarding and disrespecting others (whether you mean to or not).

And, ah, the subject of murdering unborn children.  While I do tend to view things more liberally, I’m not quite Pro-Choice.  I’m not quite Pro-Life though either, because as a male, I cannot bear children (surprising, no?).   Therefore I’d hesitate to make any judgment as I have never had my stomach engorged with that of a fetus.  Have you ever carried a child Mr. Byrne?  You seem to be an expert in what women should do.  I like to make sure I don’t get bloated after a meal by eating too much, so I know I wouldn’t be a very happy person if I had to carry that feeling multiplied by 100 for nine months.  But I digress, I’m sure some men might know about carrying a little extra weight comfortably.  This is America after all.  And if I may suggest, sir, I feel more for the soldiers we’ve lost in Iraq and their grieving families.  I’m not going to compare numbers though, I don’t frankly care about statistics.  Life is life.  My point is this: you cannot pardon a man who is responsible for the needless deaths of our young adults simply because he “protects” unborn children.  And yet, he didn’t outlaw abortion, did he?  It still continues no matter what you think of our President.

I have a suggestion now directly for the Beacon.  I propose we do some ‘down and dirty’ investigative reporting.  Let us kidnap a Mr. LoPresto in the dead of night, strip him, photograph him, the publish the results.  Since it seems that this is not torture, he should be able to stand the simple humiliation.  We all know he’s withstood his writings being published publically.  Frankly if anyone still thinks that Iraq had a connection to terrorists they have been completely and totally ignoring the media for at least the past 4 years.  First it was “weapons of mass destruction” that we started the war for (but there were none) and then the term “War on Terror” started to be bandied about.  Well, congrats to Bush’s public relations.  The masses ate it up.  The September 11th attacks had nothing, and will never have anything, to do with Iraq.  I’m sorry that you apparently didn’t do your research, but excuse is not going to fly if you’re willing to keep the same lies going.  The logic in the quote you started your letter with is greatly flawed, you’ve just proven it yourself.  No matter how many times you write about the Al Qaeda and Iraq War connections, they’re just not going to simply appear to justify your points.

Personally, I don’t advocate the right or the left.  I advocate intelligence.  I advocate information.  I advocate the truth.  It just happens that the people who are blatantly in the wrong happen to be coincidently on the right.  I suggest writers check their wit at the door and bring some knowledge for us to ponder over.  Do we want to continue to be a nation of ignorance, acceptors of half truths and smoke in mirrors?  This may be the point Mr. Byrne was looking for, I’m sure an educated society could make an educated choice on abortion.  Or war.  Or writing letters to the editors.

Yours truly,

Paul *******

‘08 Senior

It’s embarrassing that this nation, which was founded on Christianity, is submitting to the left just to be politically correct, or under the banner of being “inclusive” to other religions.  This is just another excuse for people to take religion out of everything.   December is practically a holy month because of the holiday.  No, Christmas was not instituted to coincide with an original pagan holiday when early Christians were trying to convert every breathing thing around them.  No, Christmas is not about the shopping and mindless self-indulgence we participate in to get the ‘perfect gift’.  These are just lies.

I mean, honestly.  What would the left have you believe?  That we were founded on religious freedom?  Oh, don’t make me laugh.  I’m going to agree with Huckabee, we need to take back this country for Christ!  We saw how one religion ruling has failed (Iran, Iraq), but in our ever present magnificence, we can do better!  Where were the framers of the Constitution that celebrated Hanukkah?  Kwanzaa?  So where do those holidays fit in now?  Exactly.  Nowhere.

(This is a fairly biting piece because of my constant frustration with the conservative side, the ones who are truly waging the war on freedom in our country.  Which is why I could not (and will not) bring myself to vote for a Republican in 2008.)

Just to clarify, I am actually Christian.  It’s just that I believe that sharing is good.  And this country belongs to no religion, it belongs to everyone in it :]